恩恩~~就是這個意思
很多都是唷\(QoQ)/
..謝謝大大了
[討論]套牌的設計及比賽獲勝的方法
版面規則
1.不准發表罵人的字眼(強烈負面批評的人必刪文)
2.儘量不打不美觀的注音文
3.有看不懂或不認識的牌請利用查牌網站
4.發文字數至少20中文字(對應英文40字元)。
5.有像 twn_domn這種介紹某種賽制或deck的都會置頂
6.請多用主題分類([標準],[擴充],[古典],[問題],[FUN],[其他],[公告],[討論])未使用者請盡快補上
1.不准發表罵人的字眼(強烈負面批評的人必刪文)
2.儘量不打不美觀的注音文
3.有看不懂或不認識的牌請利用查牌網站
4.發文字數至少20中文字(對應英文40字元)。
5.有像 twn_domn這種介紹某種賽制或deck的都會置頂
6.請多用主題分類([標準],[擴充],[古典],[問題],[FUN],[其他],[公告],[討論])未使用者請盡快補上
-
聾子聽啞巴說瞎子看到鬼
- 傳奇旅法師
- 文章: 2123
- 註冊時間: 2004-06-28 12:17 am
I strongly disagreetwn_domn 寫:
準備好對付共鳴的備牌 + 準備好對付 rock 的備牌 = 你已經 50% ready
In extended, you have to consider the maindeck and SB together more.
1.75 is fast. A sideproof is that Chrome mox is the most played
card in ANY serious event- only rock and affinity declines playing it
which both plays some form of acceleration - Birds or the affinity mechanic
This example intends only to say that, 1.75 emphasises on speed and other factors much differently than it is standard, and so decks must be built differently from the beginning.
Didn't you see the meddling mages(Maindeck) in affinity?
It has totally nothing to do with the theme, it's non artifact,
it actually requires one more color to support(which hurts the deck's overall power and stability, and hurts affinity mechanics).
But, it serves as a almighty precaution to opposing artifact hate plans- pernicious deed, energy flux, forcing opponents to deal with it first while facing artifact assalt, =buying extra turns.
This is what affinity sacrifices some speed and some stability for
inclusion- for playing against hate.
And, what makes the right sideboard so important?
Cause there are many good tutors, which makes any 1 sideboard card's marginal value from 0->1 multiplied by 3 to 4 - since they are more likely to appear than in standard, whichmakes each SB slot
very precious, and indeed more SB choices means the better/ the powerful cards are choosen- but so does the cards your opponents get to build decks with.
And fast means that SB cards/plans must come out fast and on a reliable basis. these choices should be made implicit while building maindecks.
Whether to wish or not? Am I running silver bullets?
These means SB buildimg should be considered with the maindeck
together from the beginning of making a deck, not just simply preparing a SB.
Say, for Goblins the best it can do in SB against affinity is
Rack and ruin... it has no tutors and is not likely to have one...
Against rock, it has nothing...
preparing sideboards? It won't help much
Re: [討論]套牌的設計及比賽獲勝的方法
恩...版主大大有問題
這篇要至頂到何時呢??
冬季決賽已經結束了
我也只拿到5-2差強人意的戰績
這篇總不可能永遠放這吧?
謝謝=.=
這篇要至頂到何時呢??
冬季決賽已經結束了
我也只拿到5-2差強人意的戰績
這篇總不可能永遠放這吧?
謝謝=.=